The other day, I was
discussing an interesting topic with a fellow intellectual, namely the future
potential eventuality of storing information in water. He was of course
skeptical and I guess I am also, but a as he worked to immediate attack the
idea, I decided to choose the antithesis and go with it. Our science and
ability to manipulate molecules and matter itself will only improve with modern
science. So, today, it might seem like magic to a good many people, but isn't
that the way of such breakthrough technology? Let's talk.
My premise is that yes,
one day, perhaps within a decade or less we can invent very simple ways,
inexpensive and efficient ways to store information, lots of it, in something
as simple as a cup full of water. My acquaintance couldn't resist in starting
our debate with a back-handed compliment, an intellectual jab if you will on my
personal character. He said;
"You know, I think
you are creative. But are you sure you know what you are saying? Water shifts
atomic position when it freezes. On your page it said you read QED. Was that
the one authored by Richard P Feynman? Because guessing at free particles and
storing data in an organized way are two very different goals."
I protested this
diversion from the topic and ignored the back-handed compliment and challenged
his knowledge on quantum mechanics and explain one potential way it might be
possible. For instance; if you are controlling the spin of the electrons, you
can control the temperature as you work, I don't find this to be a major
hurdle, you have to freeze the water anyway, do it in layers, slices and encode
as you do. Allow the water to flow from sandwich sheets onto the previously
frozen last layer.
We can see this in ice
core samples and they have stored information of all kinds, clues, history, I
am merely suggesting we take it to another level, atomic level. Water can be
controlled in many ways. We can align molecules with energy, save that
alignment, someday perhaps play with individual molecules and the atoms of
those molecules and their electrons. Once you can do that, you sure have some
nice potential.
How about another scheme
- use carbon nano-tubes and fill them with copper atoms, then remove the charge
as you code the electrons?
Lastly, I explained to
my acquaintance that his Feyman comment was actually apropos to this topic as
well, here is how; Feyman had some interesting ideas on such potentials, but
many have suggested the potential for storing data in water, I believe Sagan
had discussed this too. In Japan, they've done quite a lot of research on all
this, and noted snowflake patterns, PH, dissolved solids in water and all sorts
of things. IBM has done some interesting research on all this. I think
"water" will someday be used to store data, but along the way, we might
discover even batter molecules to use. Please consider all this and think on
it.
Lance Winslow has
launched a new provocative series of eBooks on Future Concepts. Lance
Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the
Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lance_Winslow
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/8262112
No comments:
Post a Comment